4 ms·
I had a Ryzen 1700 that didn't meet the windows 11 tpm standard. It was still working well for everything I threw at it, but I guess a little short of "modern".
by nemomarx 2y ago
I had a Ryzen 1700 that didn't meet the windows 11 tpm standard. It was still working well for everything I threw at it, but I guess a little short of "modern".
It still seems a arbitrary cut off for waste though. If TPM is standard enough on hardware surely adoption would happen regardless of OS requirements?
- fresh_broccoli 2y ago> I had a Ryzen 1700 that didn't meet the windows 11 tpm standard. It's not TPM, Zen1 does support TPM 2. Also, its instruction set is identical to Zen+ (Ryzen 2xxx), which is supported by Win11. After all, Zen+ was just a die shrink of Zen1 with some minor fixes. It really seems like they blacklisted Zen1 for no real reason.
- p_ing 2y ago> rather new and ultra-powerful computers > Ryzen 1700 Surely you jest.
- nemomarx 2y agowhat benchmark is it failing to match up to? other than AI work I can't think of a use case for a home machine where it would really be even noticeably slow. certainly it's fine for compiling code and etc. 2017 doesn't really seem old to me since improvements in chips has slowed down.
- p_ing 2y agoThe "new" benchmark. I quoted the author who said "new" and "ultra-powerful".