As with GDPR, the spirit is admirable but the fundamental definitions have been hand-waved. So for the foreseeable future, the expensive lawyers you hire are g

As with GDPR, the spirit is admirable but the fundamental definitions have been hand-waved. So for the foreseeable future, the expensive lawyers you hire are going to answer the important questions with "well, we don't have much case law yet..." Also, the definition of AI seems to exclude anything that doesn't "exhibit adaptiveness after deployment". So, a big neural network doing racist facial recognition crime prediction isn't AI as long as it can't learn on-the-fly? Is my naive HTTP request rate limiter "exhibiting adaptiveness" by keeping track of each customer's typical request rate in a float32? Laws that regulate tech need to get into the weeds of exactly what is meant by the various terms up-front, even if that means loads of examples, clarification etc.