3 ms·

Thank you for pointing that out. Corrected.

• ceol 14y ago
  In your defense, it took the author a few pages to even get to that fact.
  • CamperBob2 14y ago
    Yeah, that was pretty lame. The author is clearly being paid by the word and/or page view, and the quality of the review suffered substantially because of it. Hastur is being hasty with his FUD, all right, but it's not as if the article was much better.
  • hastur 14y ago
    Yeah, well, I didn't read the review even now and I don't plan to. And the reason is simple: If something looks waaay too good to be true, it usually is. $337 for 27'' H-IPS doesn't exist in the real world. They must have cut corners on something - and pretty badly. ...First example already provided in the Disqus guy comment: 30% failure rate in 3 months. I rest my case.