2 ms·
If that's what they want, then let them use the money to hire an Exec. If not, don't force it on them. This just limits the charities options, and only benefit
by drewsears 14y ago
If that's what they want, then let them use the money to hire an Exec. If not, don't force it on them.
This just limits the charities options, and only benefits exec.
- pavel_lishin 14y agoIs it possible that after various administrative costs, they don't end up getting $100 worth of labor out of someone, vs. $100 worth of labor by hiring Exec?
- rprasad 14y agoExec also takes administrative costs out of that $100. Either way, the charity will have to train the person. But the person the charities hires is likely to come back, so that time is not wasted. The Exec worker may never come back, rendering all of the time spent training them wasted.