> AFAICT the idea that there's something constitutionally unsavory about them is very new. I don't think anyone's claiming that they're "unsavory" - just that

> AFAICT the idea that there's something constitutionally unsavory about them is very new. I don't think anyone's claiming that they're "unsavory" - just that they are creatures of the executive that were created by the executive and may be abolished by the executive as well. And I don't think it's a new position either? The Ron Paul types have been complaining about them for literally decades.