4 ms·

Or just people's names. Something like "Joe Blow said he saw a person with a brown bag." You'd redact Joe's name even if there's nothing particularly interest

Or just people's names. Something like "Joe Blow said he saw a person with a brown bag." You'd redact Joe's name even if there's nothing particularly interesting about him.

giantg2 2y ago
You'd redact a name, but not an entire file.
- 3eb7988a1663 2y ago
  Depending on what remains, it may be possible to unblind the redacted names by considering the sum total of evidence. For example, these 10 people in the room all would have given testimony, but we only have nine statements with attached names. Who could this 10th unnamed persona be? Far easier to just keep the entire thing redacted.
  - practice9 2y ago
    With LLMs that even might be automated
    - ben_w 2y ago
      Constraint solvers would be a better choice, IMO. LLMs may help convert the text into a form for the constraint solvers, but they're not the tool I'd use for actually connecting the dots.