2 ms·
I think “unlawfully assume extraordinary powers” may apply. It’s certainly debatable, but shutting down agencies created and authorized by Congress and refusin
by stetrain 2y ago
I think “unlawfully assume extraordinary powers” may apply.
It’s certainly debatable, but shutting down agencies created and authorized by Congress and refusing to distribute funding legislated by Congress seems to be an overstep of executive power, and therefore an undermining of Congress’s power.
My main point was that ousting an incumbent or defying an election is not a requirement for something to be a coup, as the previous comment was suggesting. A legitimately elected official seizing more power than they are legally entitled to is a form of coup.
- invalidOrTaken 2y agoThere is certainly a transfer of power going on, but whether that's unlawful will be for the courts to decide.
- stetrain 2y agoI’m not sure a court ruling is a requirement for something to be called a coup.
- invalidOrTaken 2y agoanyone can call anything anything, sure(is it a "coup" when I paint a good painting, or win a game of chess? https://www.thefreedictionary.com/coup https://www.thefreedictionary.com/coup), but the great-grandparent comment referred to a "bizarre and highly illegal" coup.