4 ms·
I don't understand why the editors allowed the engineers' names to be made public. What did they hope to gain by doing this other than making them magnets for h
by fzliu 2y ago
I don't understand why the editors allowed the engineers' names to be made public. What did they hope to gain by doing this other than making them magnets for harassment and possibly threats?
- minimaxir 2y agoThe identities of the engineers are now unambigiously in the public interest as they now have an impact on the government. These aren't scrappy hackers trolling on internet forums.
- rozap 2y agoThey're public servants. Most public servants have their name, position, level, salary, etc listed in public datasets. There is no "doxxing" of public servants. This isn't a usenet.
- ceejayoz 2y agoNow do @libsoftiktok. Or Musk himself: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1858916546338590740 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1858916546338590740 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1858914228624924963 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1858914228624924963
- fullshark 2y agoThe American people deserve to know what is happening in their government.
- tgv 2y agoIsn't it free speech? Yes, that is a comment in style against the guidelines of this forum, but you've got to admire the irony.
- latency-guy2 2y agoIn normal circumstances, e.g. as contractors I would agree. However, they are not, as far as I can tell they are operating as federal employees. No federal employee name is private. I do see this (article) as mostly retaliation though. Maybe deserved or not. Hard to tell at this point. But these people are public employees nevertheless, they never had the option for anonymity.