> Bayesian epistemology is probably the best description of how we know things based on science. This is wrong, and it's a bit ironic you are so adamant on a p

> Bayesian epistemology is probably the best description of how we know things based on science. This is wrong, and it's a bit ironic you are so adamant on a point that is bad philosophy and leads to bad science as a way of insisting that philosophy has no relevance for science.