And as I explained in my post, there is substantial evidence that the effect (including the economic) is positive. The reason why the other information is incl

And as I explained in my post, there is substantial evidence that the effect (including the economic) is positive. The reason why the other information is included is because if you are arguing from fact, you do not understand this topic. None of the arguments are fact-based (when someone says they made a decision based on data, it does not mean it is objective).