Sure, I get that reading the act is more important than the article. And in reading the act, I didn't see any clear definitions. They have broad references to

Sure, I get that reading the act is more important than the article. And in reading the act, I didn't see any clear definitions. They have broad references to what reads much like any ML algorithm, with carve outs for areas where manipulating or influencing is expected (like advertising). Where in the act does it actually define the bar for a technology to be considered AI? A link or a quote would be really helpful here, I didn't see such a description but it is easy to miss in legal texts.