3 ms·
1. The quality of pictures is lower than on Twitter, which I was using mostly for porn 2. Blocking someone prevents that person from even seeing your posts, wh
by anal_reactor 2y ago
1. The quality of pictures is lower than on Twitter, which I was using mostly for porn
2. Blocking someone prevents that person from even seeing your posts, which means that from the perspective of a lurker, it's best not to follow anyone, not to engage with anyone at all, not to make anyone aware of your existence, because 1% of people you follow will block you just because they're having a bad day
3. The Python client makes baby Jesus cry
- fatata123 2y ago[dead]
- DrBenCarson 2y ago1. Sorry for you 2. Don’t almost all blocks behave that way? Twitter’s always did. Seems Elon, in his infinite social acuity, has confused “block” with “mute?” Vast majority of users want to be able to actually “block” people 3. Baby Jesus cries very easily, he’s a baby
- anal_reactor 2y ago> Don’t almost all blocks behave that way? No > Baby Jesus cries very easily, he’s a baby I've never seen official baby Jesus merch with him crying
- ASalazarMX 2y ago> I've never seen official baby Jesus merch with him crying You might have been distracted attending more immediate matters, Mr. Anal_Reactor.
- rsynnott 2y ago> No That's how Twitter's block always worked before the advent of Naughty Old Mr Car. It's also how the block on every social media thing I can think of works.