4 ms·
Do other models do well for the same use cases? I thought LLMs are only good for low-value adtech codes and resources accessible on public Internet, like tons o
by numpad0 2y ago
Do other models do well for the same use cases? I thought LLMs are only good for low-value adtech codes and resources accessible on public Internet, like tons of getters/setters and onEvent triggers without much CS elements or time or multi domain implications.
They're also hyper sensitive to what I'd describe as geometric congruency between input and output: your input has to be able to be decompressed into final form with basically zero IQ spent on it, as if the input were zipped version of as yet existing output that the LLM simply macro-expanded.
R1 is just an improved LLM, nothing groundbreaking in those specific areas. Common limitations of LLMs still apply.
IMO, the layman's model of LLM should be more of predictive text than AI. It's a super fast keyboard that types faster than, not better than, your fingers.
- diggan 2y ago> I thought LLMs are only good for low-value adtech codes and resources accessible on public Internet, like tons of getters/setters and onEvent triggers without much CS elements or time or multi domain implications. I'm not sure where you get this generalization from. It seems like most local models you can run locally today on consumer hardware are kind of at that level, at least in my experience. But then you have things like o1 "pro mode" which pretty much allowed me to program things I couldn't before, and no other LLM until o1 could actually help me do.