2 ms·
It's not 80% emissions. Thanks not how math works. It's 80% of the emissions it was yesterday. That's better right?
by iancmceachern 2y ago
It's not 80% emissions. Thanks not how math works.
It's 80% of the emissions it was yesterday. That's better right?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- trimethylpurine 2y agoYou said it was zero, let's talk about that math. If you care to show me how it's zero, I'm happy to listen. I'd prefer if the answer is not based on lying because it's "better." For me, actual science is better. >That's better right? Not if it could have been better than that but wasn't because someone lied to get their product purchased over a better one. The better product being selected because it's factually better for the environment; that's better.
- iancmceachern 2y agoI didn't say it was zero. I said it's as good as it gets. Show me another ferry that is cleaner. There is no lie anywhere. You are arguing to argue. Come to SF, I'll buy you a ferry ticket and a coffee and we can talk about it on the hydrogen ferry itself.
- trimethylpurine 2y agoI see. You're right, I assumed the implication because of my original comment. It seems I lost the context of the discussion then. I'm arguing to defend science because I believe claims of zero emissions when in fact they are not hurts progress both economically and through wear on trust in science. I appreciate the invitation. Maybe next time I'm in the bay. Cheers.