4 ms·
> they are probabilistic language models This is like arguing an Airbus cannot possibly fly because it is 165 tonnes of aluminum, steel and plastic. The proof
by panarky 2y ago
> they are probabilistic language models
This is like arguing an Airbus cannot possibly fly because it is 165 tonnes of aluminum, steel and plastic.
The proof is in the fact that it flies, not what it is constructed from.
- ADeerAppeared 2y ago> The proof is in the fact that it flies, not what it is constructed from. And LLMs do not. > "But it looks like reasoning to me" My condolences. You should go see a doctor about your inability to count the number of 'R's in a word.
- panarky 2y ago"Even though that Airbus looks like it's flying it's really not because my personal definition of 'flying' requires feathers and flapping wings."
- rizky05 2y ago[dead]
- CamperBob2 2y agoOK, what's your next move, now that letter-counting has been solved by the current generation of frontier models? CoT reasoning is reasoning, whether you like it or not. If you don't understand that, it means the models are already smarter than you.