>within his core constitutional powers Well that's the part to challenge, no? As we've seen much too often, just because one ruling happens doesn't mean that l

>within his core constitutional powers Well that's the part to challenge, no? As we've seen much too often, just because one ruling happens doesn't mean that later cases can't overturn that precedent. I'd rather encourage and cheer on these powers because it's not like you and me are doing anything.