5 ms·

Cost of living in Canada has been untenable for the past decade. The choice is to bend the knee or suffer more with the hopes you’ll at least go down with pride

Cost of living in Canada has been untenable for the past decade. The choice is to bend the knee or suffer more with the hopes you’ll at least go down with pride. I have no idea how the hell the government across the border got their citizens to start hating on us within a couple of weeks.

School-Cotton 2y ago
They didn’t. The vast majority of Americans don’t hate Canadians. You don’t need a popular referendum to set tariffs, the president can just do it. One of the many downsides of electing a crazy person as president.
- tokioyoyo 2y ago
  Fair, apologies for having a knee-jerk reaction to it. It just sucks to scroll a tiny bit on forums and get bombarded with pure hate. I understand that it doesn’t represent the majority, but makes you scratch your head and think why so many level headed people are willing to throw away trust that was built throughout decades. Like I get the whole America First approach, and understand the desire to build out the manufacturing locally… but is it worth it to turn away all of your allies and make them get closer with the actual super power that wants to dethrone you?
  - dismalaf 2y ago
    To be fair Canada and most of the EU haven't come close to fulfillment our NATO requirements since, well, ever. For better or worse most of the free world freeloads off the US' security shield. Canada is especially egregious, where we have a bunch of tariffs and regulations protecting certain Canadian corporations while expecting the US to protect us and buy our products. All the while smugly criticizing them for it.
    - tokioyoyo 2y ago
      US gets unquestionable currency dominance from US' security shield. Don't get me wrong, but if that was a real concern, they would've started the tariff war 4, 6, 8 years ago. Economical and political headwinds are showing potential Chinese dominance across all manufacturing and export industries. This is the actual time when US is being threatened and trying to bully others, because they can't fix the problem themselves.
    - timeon 2y ago
      > To be fair Canada and most of the EU haven't come close to fulfillment our NATO requirements since, well, ever. For better or worse most of the free world freeloads off the US' security shield. USA is only country that used article 5. Other NATO countries served USA til now not other way around. But it seems that this will end soon. At least in EU, where pro-Russian parties are gaining power.
      - dismalaf 2y ago
        The threat of article 5 is powerful... It's the only thing that's prevented Russia from rolling through the Baltics.
    - Timon3 2y ago
      > To be fair Canada and most of the EU haven't come close to fulfillment our NATO requirements since, well, ever. Which requirements are those? I'm aware of an agreed 2% GDP target for 2024, which we've reached. Are there other requirements we haven't reached?
      - dismalaf 2y ago
        https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/defence-spending-two-percent-defence-spending-target-1.7440870 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/defence-spending-two-percen... Lol we haven't reached it and Trudeau's timeline wasn't anywhere close to 2024. We only reached ~1.3% of GDP.
        Timon3 2y ago
        Sorry, I was referring to the EU, not Canada. Should have added that. But if I understand the requirements correctly, it was never about every country reaching 2%, only a majority. Has that not been reached?
  - School-Cotton 2y ago
    What forums are you on where you’re reading pure hate for Canadians?
carbine 2y ago
sentiment differences are powerful though -- some Americans might rally behind Trump, but if cost of living goes up significantly they won't be patient about it, especially given it's clear that Trump started this whole thing. meanwhile -- excepting those who CAN'T, for whom there may well be govt assistance -- Canadians are angry and will endure (relatively more) pain to prove a point. not saying I want this outcome, but I think the willingness to endure pain to harm the opposing party is different in each country.

School-Cotton 2y ago

They didn’t. The vast majority of Americans don’t hate Canadians. You don’t need a popular referendum to set tariffs, the president can just do it. One of the many downsides of electing a crazy person as president.

tokioyoyo 2y ago
Fair, apologies for having a knee-jerk reaction to it. It just sucks to scroll a tiny bit on forums and get bombarded with pure hate. I understand that it doesn’t represent the majority, but makes you scratch your head and think why so many level headed people are willing to throw away trust that was built throughout decades. Like I get the whole America First approach, and understand the desire to build out the manufacturing locally… but is it worth it to turn away all of your allies and make them get closer with the actual super power that wants to dethrone you?
- dismalaf 2y ago
  To be fair Canada and most of the EU haven't come close to fulfillment our NATO requirements since, well, ever. For better or worse most of the free world freeloads off the US' security shield. Canada is especially egregious, where we have a bunch of tariffs and regulations protecting certain Canadian corporations while expecting the US to protect us and buy our products. All the while smugly criticizing them for it.
  - tokioyoyo 2y ago
    US gets unquestionable currency dominance from US' security shield. Don't get me wrong, but if that was a real concern, they would've started the tariff war 4, 6, 8 years ago. Economical and political headwinds are showing potential Chinese dominance across all manufacturing and export industries. This is the actual time when US is being threatened and trying to bully others, because they can't fix the problem themselves.
  - timeon 2y ago
    > To be fair Canada and most of the EU haven't come close to fulfillment our NATO requirements since, well, ever. For better or worse most of the free world freeloads off the US' security shield. USA is only country that used article 5. Other NATO countries served USA til now not other way around. But it seems that this will end soon. At least in EU, where pro-Russian parties are gaining power.
    - dismalaf 2y ago
      The threat of article 5 is powerful... It's the only thing that's prevented Russia from rolling through the Baltics.
  - Timon3 2y ago
    > To be fair Canada and most of the EU haven't come close to fulfillment our NATO requirements since, well, ever. Which requirements are those? I'm aware of an agreed 2% GDP target for 2024, which we've reached. Are there other requirements we haven't reached?
    - dismalaf 2y ago
      https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/defence-spending-two-percent-defence-spending-target-1.7440870 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/defence-spending-two-percen... Lol we haven't reached it and Trudeau's timeline wasn't anywhere close to 2024. We only reached ~1.3% of GDP.
      - Timon3 2y ago
        Sorry, I was referring to the EU, not Canada. Should have added that. But if I understand the requirements correctly, it was never about every country reaching 2%, only a majority. Has that not been reached?
- School-Cotton 2y ago
  What forums are you on where you’re reading pure hate for Canadians?

carbine 2y ago

sentiment differences are powerful though -- some Americans might rally behind Trump, but if cost of living goes up significantly they won't be patient about it, especially given it's clear that Trump started this whole thing. meanwhile -- excepting those who CAN'T, for whom there may well be govt assistance -- Canadians are angry and will endure (relatively more) pain to prove a point. not saying I want this outcome, but I think the willingness to endure pain to harm the opposing party is different in each country.