3 ms·
The implication of the term is that there are other contexts for "male" or "female" other than "biologically". If "non-woke" contexts assume that male/female ar
by Qwertious 2y ago
The implication of the term is that there are other contexts for "male" or "female" other than "biologically". If "non-woke" contexts assume that male/female are inherently biological terms, then "biologically [male/female" is obviously "woke".
- technothrasher 2y agoYour second sentence is tautological, and also begging the question.
- pests 2y agoI don't see the implication. How is it obviously woke?
- honestSysAdmin 2y ago[dead]
- Qwertious 2y agoIt acknowledges trans people exist. And I put the word "woke" in quotes, because it's stupid and it's not my word.