3 ms·
I discuss this a bit in footnote 1. Thousands of things were built on frames before computers, of course. However, IBM both built computers from semi-portable c
by kens 2y ago
I discuss this a bit in footnote 1. Thousands of things were built on frames before computers, of course. However, IBM both built computers from semi-portable cabinets built around metal frames and also referred to the computer's units as "frames", including the "main frame".
Telephone systems used main distribution frames, but these are unrelated. First, they look nothing like a computer mainframe, being a large rack with cable connections. Second, there isn't a path from the telephony systems to the computer mainframes; if the first mainframes were developed at Bell Labs, for instance, it would be plausible.
As for Colossus, it was built on 90-inch racks, called the J rack, K rack, S rack, C rack, and so forth; see https://www.codesandciphers.org.uk/lorenz/colossus.htm https://www.codesandciphers.org.uk/lorenz/colossus.htm
- cyberax 2y agoAT&T had https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_Five_Crossbar_Switching_System https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_Five_Crossbar_Switching... in 1947. It used relay-driven "markers" to set up a call that goes through various frames. So it's entirely possible that somebody from the telephone industry decided to borrow a term of art from it for computing.
- BOOSTERHIDROGEN 2y agoCould you kindly write a blog post regarding a recent development in GaN chargers? Many thanks.