3 ms·
Are you serious? A. he already broke the law. The point in notifying in advance is for Congress to push back if they think the reason was inappropriate, as Ins
by phonon 2y ago
Are you serious?
A. he already broke the law. The point in notifying in advance is for Congress to push back if they think the reason was inappropriate, as Inspector Generals are the watchdogs that report to Congress.
B. Do you really think he had "the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons for any such removal or transfer" for 17 simultaneous firings days into his administration?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- amazingamazing 2y ago[flagged]
- llamaimperative 2y agoI’m just imagining you seeing a bank robbery and it’s hilarious. Bystander: “call the police, he’s breaking the law!” You: “You’re letting your mind rot. He broke the law? What’s the docket number of the case where the judge says this?” /r/iamverysmart content here. Anyway, the law is crystal clear. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11546 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11546
- amazingamazing 2y ago[flagged]
- llamaimperative 2y agoLol, okay buddy. You're right. You're extremely smart. Good job being smart. Keep on truckin'.
- phonon 2y agoIf someone shoplifts in front of me, I can't say that person "broke the law"? The law is crystal clear, and he didn't follow it intentionally.
- amazingamazing 2y ago> If someone shoplifts in front of me, I can't say that person "broke the law"? You can say they did, but it doesn’t mean anything until it’s determined. People make accusations all of the time. Many are wrong.
- llamaimperative 2y agoYeah no shit, no one is looking to skip the court case ya goofball.
- Matthyze 2y agoLaw isn't synonymous with prosecution. Think decriminalisation.