3 ms·
This wouldn't be the first time IP laws hurt Western innovation and security. When WW1 started - despite the airplane being invented in Dayton, Ohio - the US ha
by Kim_Bruning 2y ago
This wouldn't be the first time IP laws hurt Western innovation and security. When WW1 started - despite the airplane being invented in Dayton, Ohio - the US had fallen so far behind they had to use French aircraft. Why? The Wright brothers' patent wars had effectively frozen US aviation development.
Today it's not just one industry - Western IP laws are slowing progress across multiple tech frontiers. While companies navigate complex IP restrictions (In EU and US), China's development is following a sharp exponential curve. You can already see it clearly in robotics, electric vehicles, and now these last weeks with AI.
While in the west you deal with predatory licensing (try talking with Siemens, Oracle, or Autodesk), and everyone keeps working on barriers and moats; other nations that allow a more collaborative approach (voluntary or not) are on an accelerating trajectory.
IP law is clearly no longer suitable for purpose - we need a system that encourages collaboration more directly. A complete free for all isn't ideal either - and I certainly don't advocate that- but even that appears to be better than what we have now.
- absolutelastone 2y agoI think our IP laws are optimized to maximize benefits for the legal system.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> our IP laws are optimized to maximize benefits for the legal system Versus the content owners?!?
- autobodie 2y agoThey're optimized to maximize profit for capital owners. Another word for this is capitalism.
- wrtka 2y ago[flagged]
- _factor 2y agoCopyright is a form of censorship in an absolute sense. It leads to a less skilled / educated populace and consolidates wealth. For a capitalist nation, it’s very anti free-market.