3 ms·
Without reading it you cannot assert at all if their bias is unfounded. Their naming and mission shouldn't detract from at least a basic analysis of what's said
by piva00 2y ago
Without reading it you cannot assert at all if their bias is unfounded. Their naming and mission shouldn't detract from at least a basic analysis of what's said.
I guess Byung-Chul Han is right about how digital/online discourse being just a swarm of shitstorming by anonymous narcissists, you showcased how without even a cursory look you let your reactive side out without even a question of how this behaviour doesn't fit the space. You just wanted to shout, and shout you did...
- baggy_trough 2y ago> Without reading it you cannot assert at all if their bias is unfounded. You're simply wrong about that. I can assert it based on a heuristic, one that has significant predictive power in my experience.
- piva00 2y agoAs I expected this exchange would end with a thought-terminating cliché. Sad.