3 ms·
The only thing really bad about win11 are the UI changes they did to the taskbar. Apart from that the os is solid with great features that are very helpful. One
by perryizgr8 2y ago
The only thing really bad about win11 are the UI changes they did to the taskbar. Apart from that the os is solid with great features that are very helpful. One example is the window tiling stuff that is simple and easy, but you can pull of quite complicated layouts too.
The multi desktop feature is way better than what macos has. The multi monitor support is second to none. The performance is amazing, especially compared to a similarly specced macos machine. Ubuntu does still feel faster though.
If there's one thing I'd like, it would have to be a win2000 style UI. Truly the pinnacle of design and aesthetics.
- lithos 2y agoWindows changing UI so often did soften the learning blow for me, when moving to Linux. Especially nowadays on Linux where you I've only "needed" terminal for getting a graphics tablet to map and for a video card update. (I'm willing to ignore software development going to terminal, since serious software development usually goes to terminal on windows anyways) . XFCE is quite good at being XP/2000 era gui. The version I'm using is practically XP except with local software search and workspaces.
- louky 2y agoI ended up on Debian/XFCE. Lightweight enough and I've worked out how everything works and have it customized 100% to my workflow.