> I don't see how "attaching" functions to types is easier than attaching them directly to namespaces. There's basically no difference between a static class a

> I don't see how "attaching" functions to types is easier than attaching them directly to namespaces. There's basically no difference between a static class and a namespace, so you're right, it's not easier, but then this kind of dissolves your whole argument too: just put your functions in static class or two, what's the big deal? It's just like a namespace after all.