4 ms·
It is relevant again, because one would like to know whether DOGE will install this in the US government. As for the article, I find it hard to understand what
by Lrhagz15 2y ago
It is relevant again, because one would like to know whether DOGE will install this in the US government.
As for the article, I find it hard to understand what Palantir is actually doing. The article uses Airbus as an example, which ordered some kind of a software system for coordinating manufacturing. The article claims:
"This ended up helping to drive the A350 manufacturing surge and successfully 4x’ing the pace of manufacturing while keeping Airbus’s high standards of quality."
I find this extremely hard to believe. The A350 isn't the first aircraft that Airbus has built.
I'm also skeptical on European reliance on deep state related companies. It is enough that Airbus already uses Google for mail handling (industrial espionage?). Given that the US is now officially a potential EU enemy with territorial aspirations in Greenland, these things have to stop for our national security.
- oncallthrow 2y ago> Given that the US is now officially a potential EU enemy This is absolutely delusional
- timeon 2y agoHow is it delusional when US wants to have trade war with EU, and now there is also this territorial dispute?
- arccy 2y agotariffs, sale restrictions, trade wars
- SmirkingRevenge 2y agoAdd threatening territorial annexation of a NATO ally to the list
- alistairSH 2y agoYou would think so, but it’s a clearly stated goal of the new POTUS. So here we are.
- Apocryphon 2y agoThe Danes sure are taking the Greenland demands seriously
- watwut 2y agoHe literally threatens to take away territory from an EU country.
- yffh86g 2y agoAirbus ex CEO and COO who was supposed to become CEO left (or got kicked out depending on who tells that story). One ended up joining Palintir EU and the other ended up joining the EU attempt at Palantir - Helsing.