3 ms·
> So the answer is that the `std::move` does nothing and should be omitted You can't assign an rvalue into an lvalue reference, precisely to avoid this sort of
by quietbritishjim 2y ago
> So the answer is that the `std::move` does nothing and should be omitted
You can't assign an rvalue into an lvalue reference, precisely to avoid this sort of mistake. If this is the only overload then this just wouldn't compile (e.g. [1]). So the std::move isn't doing nothing, but yes it should be omitted. Maybe it's just a weird typo.
[1] https://ideone.com/4NS5dI https://ideone.com/4NS5dI
- tempodox 2y agoIndeed, I don't even have to compile it, vim (+ Syntastic) tells me as soon as it sees it: candidate function not viable: expects an lvalue for 1st argument