Yes, which is excellent (although 50 years too late, I'll try not to be too cynical...). The problem is that C++ is a huge language which is complex and surely

Yes, which is excellent (although 50 years too late, I'll try not to be too cynical...). The problem is that C++ is a huge language which is complex and surely not easy to implement. If I want a small, easy language for my next microprocessor project, it probably won't be C++20. It seems like C is a good fit, but really it's not because it's a high level language with a myriad of weird semantics. AFAIK we don't have a simple "portable assembler + a few niceties" language. We either use assembly (too low level), or C (slightly too high level and full of junk).