I think this technically wouldn't be a null pointer anymore. As array indexing `p[n]` is defined as `*(p + n)` so first you create a new pointer by doing math o

I think this technically wouldn't be a null pointer anymore. As array indexing `p[n]` is defined as `*(p + n)` so first you create a new pointer by doing math on a null pointer (which is UB in C) then dereferencing this new pointer (which doesn't even really exist because you have already committed UB).