4 ms·
Yes, as it should be. Criticize the policies, not an administration led by a party you don't align with.
by chrislongss 2y ago
Yes, as it should be. Criticize the policies, not an administration led by a party you don't align with.
- hobs 2y agoOne of the policies is that if you are at all a journalist you are an enemy of the state. During his rallies he'd literally have the entire crowd riled up against the very concept of journalists, because they might not suck up to him every single second of every single day. Seriously, where do comments like this keep coming from?
- iforgot22 2y agoMaybe it's better to say the current administration is battling journalism, in a one-sided way. There's a real difference, but it looks too much like splitting hairs.
- kccoder 2y agoWhat about criticizing a lawless administration, filled to the gills with unqualified sycophants, bereft of empathy, kindness, and all human decency?
- johnnyanmac 2y agoWhy not both? The administration doesn't stop this, the policies suck and only transfer weath from the working class to the elite
- tzs 2y agoIt's more the administration is attacking journalism than the other way around. For example, the FCC regularly receives complaints against pretty much every broadcaster that they are biased and the FCC regularly dismisses those because broadcasters are supposed to be allowed to take positions that politicians may disagree with. Until now. The new FCC chairman reinstated complaints against all the major network stations that were alleged to have a liberal bias and is now subpoenaing them, and did not reinstate any complaints against major network stations (e.g., FOX) that allege conservative bias.