3 ms·
in the article it explains they have restrictions on pharma content in posts and in this case over-enforced and they corrected. What's the moral of the story?
by tonymet 2y ago
in the article it explains they have restrictions on pharma content in posts and in this case over-enforced and they corrected.
What's the moral of the story? Are they claiming that Meta is against abortions?
The company pays for employees to travel to get abortions and pays for egg freezing.
- unethical_ban 2y agoAn anomalous uptick in censoring information that is politically biased toward the new authoritarian regime is suspicious. Especially when Zuck has explicitly stated his desire to get "in" with the leader, his ~~bribe~~ donation to the leader's inauguration, and so on. It's also possible that it was as innocuous as aggressive automod.
- tonymet 2y agocan you explain that part though? i'm still not reading it. is it censoring abortion pills are pro trump activity?
- unethical_ban 2y agoYes, I'm saying it's plausible that Meta is acting in line with the Trump administration. The GOP is very anti abortion, to the point state AGs are trying to prosecute put of state doctors for prescribing abortive pills.
- tonymet 2y agoI hear you , and that's a stretch. Trump is a party of his own. Until recently, most of the GOP were Trump antagonists. He was so soft on the abortion issue during the campaign that most pro-lifer's wrote him off until he won.