>https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/06/tech/twitter-files-lawyers/in https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/06/tech/twitter-files-lawyers/in... The roles are entirely reversed h

>https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/06/tech/twitter-files-lawyers/in https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/06/tech/twitter-files-lawyers/in... The roles are entirely reversed here. Rather than the company voluntarily complying with the administration, musk alleges that biden administration officials illegally try to pressure twitter. I agree that if trump tried to illegally pressure zuck into censoring abortion pills, that would be improper on the part of trump, but at the same time I wouldn't fault zuck for caving. >Yes, that was and is explicitly legal. >(Morally shitty. But that's freedom!) The question is whether it's "democratic", not whether it's illegal. The fact that you think it's "morally shitty", suggests think that you agree it's antidemocratic.