> I did not argue God exists because no one can prove he doesn't. You are saying that by claiming that my claim is dogma. If I say the sky appears blue that is

> I did not argue God exists because no one can prove he doesn't. You are saying that by claiming that my claim is dogma. If I say the sky appears blue that isn't dogma, it's a statement of human perception of reality. I see it, you see it, everyone sees it. We know because it's what we perceive. We know how it works down to the quantum level. We can describe it with words and with math. We can test it. Claiming there is a god is not that and the fact that it's unfalsifiable doesn't lend it a shred of legitimacy. It's an idea, nothing more.