3 ms·
> 72% of all votes cast (...), excluding votes of shares owned, directly or indirectly, by Messrs. Elon and Kimbal Musk. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/dat
by diogocp 2y ago
> 72% of all votes cast (...), excluding votes of shares owned, directly or indirectly, by Messrs. Elon and Kimbal Musk.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000110465924071439/tm2413800d31_8k.htm https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000110465924...
- jedberg 2y agoThat's still shares though, not people. Ok, we've excluded two large shareholders, but there are still plenty other large holders who are friends and associates of the board.
- diogocp 2y agoI'm not sure what your point even is. Large shareholders have large shareholdings. They have a lot of skin in the game. They're going to vote according to what they think is best _for themselves_, not for Musk. You don't fool around when you have billions of dollars at stake. Small shareholders who only own a couple of shares can afford to vote for fun because, at the end of the day, the outcome won't affect them much. And for fun they did vote, 90% in favor. [1] Their support was never really in question. The only doubt was whether the big institutional investors (BlackRock, Vanguard, etc.) would go along with it. Vanguard had actually originally voted against it in 2018, but supported it in 2024. [1] https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/musks-small-investor-army-cheers-apparent-approval-56-billion-tesla-pay-package-2024-06-13/ https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/musks-...