3 ms·
Personally because my first thought when I saw the title was that it was going to be another case of the police confiscating cash from someone because they thou
by neaden 2y ago
Personally because my first thought when I saw the title was that it was going to be another case of the police confiscating cash from someone because they thought it was "suspicious". I think this title is purposefully trying to mislead people.
- autoexec 2y agoI don't think your assumptions make the article misleading. I think it's a reasonable concern that if the government views money as not being property that view will make it easier for them to engage in civil-forfeiture and prevail in challenges to the practice.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- int_19h 2y agoThe title accurately describes the government's legal argument, though.