2 ms·

Can they fill the screen with 20 variations nearly instantly? If so, I'd like to see that.

• Jordan-117 2y ago
  There are already efficient models that can generate single images in real time as fast as you can type the prompt. I wonder if you could tweak this approach to instead generate a page full of static thumbnails on submitting a query (using different seeds for each result), and then upscale the desired image when clicked.
  • Filligree 2y ago
    It won’t be the same image once you upscale it. Moreover, while the fast generators do exist, they’re lower quality. That doesn’t mean just resolution—it also means comprehension and prompt understanding, so upon running the same prompt through a better AI you’ll get something entirely different.
• TZubiri 2y ago
  So we experience a marvellous breakthrough in technology and your big complaint is that it's not fast or voluminous enough, and your big idea is to make (demand) more of it? There's million of useful stuff you can create with what you are given. Do not chose to complain about what you have and demand more.
• Philpax 2y ago
  This [0] is 149 images per second, late ~2023. Not sure what the current SOTA is here on the quality/speed axes, but I'd imagine it's better. [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/18buns9/sd_generation_at_149_images_per_second_with_code/ https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/18buns9/sd...
  • skybrian 2y ago
    But that’s just a demo. Are there any image generators that generate 20 images ata time by default?