3 ms·
Not my opinion but the rationale behind this, as argued, is that removing pronouns will cause less divisiveness because fewer people care about pronouns than po
by darth_avocado 2y ago
Not my opinion but the rationale behind this, as argued, is that removing pronouns will cause less divisiveness because fewer people care about pronouns than politics.
- marcod 2y agoDEI is just their latest obsession, since the old ones don't poll as well anymore (gay marriage, woke, CRT, SJW, ..). I don't think there is a bigger rationale behind this than 'we need a wedge issue to rile up the masses'.
- SmirkingRevenge 2y agoExactly. Minorities are their scapegoats, it's not any more complex than that.
- t-writescode 2y agoEvery single employee should change their name to Alex and Sam.
- keybored 2y agoThey scream about fringe issues that few people care about and then claim that it is for the benefit of the majority. Like all the brouhaha they manufactured about trans people, a vanishingly small part of any population.
- Reasoning 2y agoThis post perfectly describes progressives and conservatives.
- happytoexplain 2y agoEven more accurately, it perfectly describes people - specifically, the worst in people. But the devil is in the details.
- keybored 2y ago> But the devil is in the details. Said the person who started his comment by erasing all distinctions.
- Thrymr 2y agoAnd does it reduce divisiveness by forcing this to happen in a few hours across the federal workforce of a couple million people? If this was a serious rationale, the agencies would have some time to make a plan and implement it (say 30 days). This is exactly to sow division and chaos, to find out who the enemies of this administration are, and who will comply without complaining to ridiculous wasteful demands.