I think it's important to bring up the face that llama.cpp has an MIT license[0]. Notably, the MIT license "permits reuse within proprietary software, provided

I think it's important to bring up the face that llama.cpp has an MIT license[0]. Notably, the MIT license "permits reuse within proprietary software, provided that all copies of the software or its substantial portions include a copy of the terms of the MIT License and also a copyright notice.[1]" You'll find that Ollama is also distributed under an MIT license[2]. It's fine to disagree with their priorities and lack of transparency. But trying to argue how they use code from other repositories that permit such a thing is tilting at windmills, IMHO. [0] https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/blob/master/LICENSE [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License [2] https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/LICENSE