4 ms·
People frequently accuse science they don't like of being like an "ideology". "(Climate Change|Evolution|The concept of a flat earth) is like an ideology to so
by muglug 2y ago
People frequently accuse science they don't like of being like an "ideology".
"(Climate Change|Evolution|The concept of a flat earth) is like an ideology to some people — they get angry the minute you start to question it".
- bArray 2y agoJust because something is Science, does not make it above being ideological. There is tonnes of evidence for this collected [0]: > The trio set out with the intent to expose problems in what they called "grievance studies", referring to academic areas where they claim "a culture has developed in which only certain conclusions are allowed ... and put social grievances ahead of objective truth". They proved their point. When only papers of a certain conclusion are accepted which further an ideological belief, Science is dead. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair
- rendang 2y agoPeople may say that, although it isn't exactly hard to differentiate them. All scientific propositions/hypotheses/findings are "is" statements. Ideologies are made up of "ought" statements. There is no Venn diagram overlap