3 ms·
It's your job to present a convincing argument for your position. You cannot show any good evidence for it, though. You can merely assert correlation (if a ba
by pfdietz 2y ago
It's your job to present a convincing argument for your position.
You cannot show any good evidence for it, though. You can merely assert correlation (if a bad one, given that nuclear was in trouble long before TMI or Chernobyl).
It's clear what's going on here: the actual situation, that nuclear has failed economically, is completely unacceptable to you, so you are confabulating a fantasy that something else caused nuclear's troubles. It's wishful denial of reality to preserve the illusion that your energy waifu has any chance.
- wqaatwt 2y ago> nuclear has failed economically, is completely unacceptable to you Surely you must be trolling? Or you just can’t read? How many times did I repeat that? > It's wishful denial of reality I mean you are literally looking and what I wrote and seeing words that are not there.