4 ms·
If you are some low level employee, certainly, the liability is too much. But very higher level employees and Zuck himself? I would have to see actual proof of
by AngryData 2y ago
If you are some low level employee, certainly, the liability is too much.
But very higher level employees and Zuck himself? I would have to see actual proof of very secure lockout and segregation policies and procedures with zero exceptions or higher level administration access across the entire company to even have a chance to believe it. And that is way more effort and organizationally burdensome and costly than just trusting a few people to not be morons and be available when needed because you pay them enough money to not blab or give out access to others.
- qrsjutsu 2y agoyup, and if it wasn't for all the leverage these guys have, despite NDAs, there'd be more influx due to abuse of access to sensitive data. LLMs can come up with bunches of ways how to leak info without revealing one's identity, so it's safe to assume people in higher level positions have bunches of actionable strategies already in place
- lesuorac 2y agoZuck has bigger things to care about. But in-aggregate they're checking all of that stuff; it's how Meta knew to buy Instagram (a ton of their users were using it).