2 ms·
I agree. I haven't seen any Linux OS with proper security featuring dm-verity-based Secure Boot (except for documentation in Arch explaining how to implement it
by nicecars 2y ago
I agree. I haven't seen any Linux OS with proper security featuring dm-verity-based Secure Boot (except for documentation in Arch explaining how to implement it).
Most distributions cannot be considered security-hardened by default.
What do you think is causing this situation?
- bigfatkitten 2y agoI assume lack of priority because it's boring, compared with the shiny features developers tend to care about. There's some promising work happening in Fedora land with unified kernel images, undoubtedly due to demand from Red Hat's corporate and government customers. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_Kernel_Support_Phase_2 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_Kernel_Suppor...