4 ms·
>$50,000,000 is not an insane amount of money Please reconsider the utterly nonsensical nature of your statement. Anyone who says $50 million dollars is "not a
by Dalewyn 2y ago
>$50,000,000 is not an insane amount of money
Please reconsider the utterly nonsensical nature of your statement. Anyone who says $50 million dollars is "not an insane amount of money" has no business commenting on financial affairs, let alone money provided by taxpayers.
>global cooperation as a tool for stopping authoritarianism at the source. We help nations
Cooperation is nice and warm, but the keyword there is "help". You can't help others when you need help yourself first, and right now today there are countless matters that concern ourselves and require proper attention.
Whether it's crumbling infrastructure, insufficient housing, rising costs of living and medical care, excessive costs and debts of education, measures and mandates necessary to prevent and recover from natural disasters, and many more, just imagine what another $50 million dollars could do. And it's not just that $50 million, there are certainly far more where that came from.
Hell, even if we have nothing else to spend money on we still have an utterly crazy amount of debt. Putting $50 million towards our debt (aka cutting $50 million in expenditures off our national budget) is $50 million less in debt.
>America doesn't have to help anyone. ... But we don't do that, because when we do we prove to the world that we are exactly the evil and selfish caricature of a nation they think we are.
There is nothing selfish about "putting on your own oxygen mask before helping others", aka America First. American tax dollars are first and foremost paid for the mutual benefit of Americans. If we happen to have any surplus left, then we can talk about how we can donate that money to charity for other countries.
- defrost 2y agoContext is everything. Sixteen years ago $50 million USD was the absolute low bar of interest when reporting on IPO capital raising for mineral development projects. We tracked any global mineral exploration activity; leases changing hands, ground chemistry surveys, geophysical survey, drill survey, technical reports, etc. But, for the purposes of informing investors on the Toronto TSX and elsewhere, anything less than $50 million on development was too small to be worth mentioning. It was literally the lowest least interesting amount.
- Dalewyn 2y agoI think you just ended up supporting my argument, because you perfectly explained why most people hate bean counters. Again: $50 million dollars is an insane amount of money, even moreso since it's American tax dollars and we're apparently spending it buying condoms for other countries. What the sincere fuck. That is not what I'm paying my taxes for, and I'm willing to bet a lot of Americans will agree with me. Spend that $50 million dollars on anything for the direct benefit of Americans: Student debt, food stamps, Medicare, public schools, or condoms for that matter, I don't care. Spending this money on anything for Americans is better than spending it buying condoms for other countries. Absolutely noone can convince me this is a wise and justifiable use of our (my) taxes.
- defrost 2y ago> Again: $50 million dollars is an insane amount of money Again, that's not "insane" .. it's literally the least outlay for a very small publicly listed mine; it covers a few 100 tonne haulpaks, machine shops, staff, screens, small crusher, a few conveyors, and sundries. It strikes me that you might well be out of touch with the cost of various activities.
- Dalewyn 2y agoIt strikes me that you might well be out of touch with how we are talking about American tax dollars being wasted on very questionable foreign expenditures.
- zfg 2y ago> Absolutely noone can convince me this is a wise and justifiable use of our (my) taxes. HIV affects everyone. It's best to reduce it wherever you can. You either want soft power influence or you don't. If you cede influence to other nations they will happily take it over for you. A reduction in soft power influence will make the US smaller and weaker. Nations will form business and military ties with whoever wants to be the next world hegemon (i.e. China).
- 2y ago