4 ms·

355/113 is actually [3,7,15,1]. The reason it's particularly good compared to its length is because it falls right before the 292 term (since 1/292 is a much sm

by walrus 14y ago

355/113 is actually [3,7,15,1]. The reason it's particularly good compared to its length is because it falls right before the 292 term (since 1/292 is a much smaller contribution than 1/1).

Xcelerate 14y ago
Ah, indeed you are correct. I had that wrong.
caf 14y ago
So, as noted in one of the comments to the original article, the question of why 355/113 is particularly good can be restated as a question of why the 292 term in that expansion is so large.