3 ms·
I've used Temporal a bit with a polyfill. It's a huge improvement. There's no "it's coming" really. With build processes and polyfills there's no reason to to
by stevage 2y ago
I've used Temporal a bit with a polyfill. It's a huge improvement.
There's no "it's coming" really. With build processes and polyfills there's no reason to to use it already.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 2y agoThe big bundle size is a reason.
- stevage 2y agoIs it bigger than the equivalent Luxon or whatever? Or maybe I'm just fortunate to work in sectors where no one ever really cares about bundle size.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 2y agoLuxon is 23.4kB minified+gzipped, temporal-polyfill is actually 20.5kB. I'm surprised, I thought embedding all the timezone and calendar data and possibly translations would add a lot of bytes.