3 ms·
Because, as someone else noted, it might be hidden for you because you're using something that's inside another function, macro, struct, etc.
by dgacmu 2y ago
Because, as someone else noted, it might be hidden for you because you're using something that's inside another function, macro, struct, etc.
- auggierose 2y agoYes, that is a valid reason. If I get that optimisation for free, why not? I still would not rely on that optimisation, though. If I think this could be an actual bottle neck, I would make the shared buffer explicit in my code.