3 ms·
Copyright law doesn't cover art made solely by AI, according to new decision
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mtrovo 2y agoI'm now waiting for the clear definition of "sufficient expressive elements". It feels this is going to generate a heated debate about what qualifies as meaningful human input versus just hitting generate on a prompt. I think the main takeaway is that this could have big implications for the kind of tools we develop next past simple text-to-image tools and we'll probably see more effort put on tools that allow artists to have granular control over the generated content.
- chrisjj 2y ago> I'm now waiting for the clear definition of "sufficient expressive elements". Yup. As for that more effort... "Upgrade to Pro edition for the export checkbox that make your work copyrightable". ;)