What I didn't like about the article is that he picks a couple 1 uF capacitors that he knows have good specs and then adds to the graph some random 0.1 uF cap w

What I didn't like about the article is that he picks a couple 1 uF capacitors that he knows have good specs and then adds to the graph some random 0.1 uF cap without any specs or part numbers. How do we know this is apples to apples? We don't. It is almost like he ran out of time to write the article when he got near the end. Too bad.