3 ms·
>substituting God for an artifact of human making Is it just me, or is the grammar backwards? I think it should be "substituting an artifact of human making fo
by Thorrez 2y ago
>substituting God for an artifact of human making
Is it just me, or is the grammar backwards? I think it should be "substituting an artifact of human making for God", or "substituting God with an artifact of human making".
- ta2112 2y agoAll three read the same to my own grammatical understanding.
- Thorrez 2y agoDoes "substituting x for y" mean "getting rid of x and using y instead", or does it mean "getting rid of y and using x instead"? To me, it means "getting rid of y and using x instead".
- ta2112 2y agoOh that’s interesting. I can see your point. I guess it’s a bit ambiguous and can mean either thing. As the other responder mentioned, the backwards construction in the original sounds like 19th century literature, and from context I know they mean removing x and adding y. But in another context it could mean the opposite. Thanks for pointing that out!
- mrbungie 2y agoIt reads like a romance language grammar (prob. spanish) with words translated into English without changing structure. Source: I'm spanish speaker.