8 ms·
They weren't operating as a fraud in the beginning. I'd give the benefit of the doubt that Holmes was just naive about the technical issues given her inexperien
by kevin_thibedeau 2y ago
They weren't operating as a fraud in the beginning. I'd give the benefit of the doubt that Holmes was just naive about the technical issues given her inexperience. They switched to fraud to buy time for the intended product.
- worthless-trash 2y agoIs it acceptable business practice (aka not fraud) to take money from people when an even laymen in the field can detect the level of lies. Rational human beings don't like being tricked, she was a magician of medicinal claims and knew the showmanship requirements. Extraordinary claims require some kind of data and facts to back the claim, which there was none. There is no evidence to believe they could develop this technology, optimism yes, but evidence no. It was fraud from the start.