3 ms·
LOL Google had all these bias safety researchers and all they ended up with is at the guaranteed back of the race with LLMs and diffusion models that are the wo
by renewiltord 2y ago
LOL Google had all these bias safety researchers and all they ended up with is at the guaranteed back of the race with LLMs and diffusion models that are the worst in the industry and beaten by 5-man teams with a fraction the resources. All that work on attention and the transformer architecture ruined by having safety researchers on your side. You'd have to be a total imbecile to try to replicate that in your own org, but I can see how you can sell it to some other sucker organization.
Perhaps it could be a selling point to an LLM-company that you can insert someone like Timnit Gebru into a competitor of theirs.
- fourside 2y agoOnly time will tell if Google’s caution in productizing their technology was prescient or just a dumb business decision. It seems like we’re moving into an environment where the US and China will try to beat each other at achieving AGI with absolutely no regard for doing it slow enough that we can ensure the tech is not going to get us all killed. It’s absolutely bizarre to me that some people are so focused on “innovation” seemingly without caring what the consequences could be. Like we haven’t even really understood the effects of the current version of the tech and every few months we get another big breakthrough.
- renewiltord 2y ago[flagged]